One important
feature associated with a black hole is the considerable slow-down in physical
time which takes place (relative for example to a far distant
object). This is due to an associated massive increase in gravity in the
vicinity of the black hole.
This again
is replicated in complementary fashion with respect to the “dark night”, where
likewise a considerable slow-down in psychological time takes place.
And this is
due to a corresponding increase in psychological gravity i.e. grief, leading to
an intense experience of loss.
As we know
Einstein showed in his special and general theories of relativity, how both the
speed of an object and also its acceleration (which he realised was equivalent
to gravity) can lead to significant changes in the passing of physical time
(relative to an outside observer).
Indeed when
his secretary was repeatedly burdened for simple explanations of relativity,
Einstein’s reputed response is often quoted as follows,
“When you sit with a nice girl for two hours you think it’s
only a minute, but when you sit on a hot stove for a minute you think it’s two
hours. That’s relativity.”
As I have stated before, what I find especially interesting
about this quote is that it refers to the psychological rather than the
physical aspect of relativity.
Though the two aspects are clearly related in a
complementary manner, Einstein did not seemingly realise that this holistic
connection strictly, undermined his deterministic view of science.
As we know in physical terms, when an object approaches the
speed of light, time passes more quickly (relative to a stationary observer).
Now in psychological terms the rapid passing of time
experienced in psychological terms when sitting
with a “nice” girl can be attributed - literally - to the de-light that one
thereby experiences.
When a high degree of mutual interdependence characterises a
relationship between two people, a fusing of opposite polarities (in the two separate
identities) takes place, leading to the psychological generation of spiritual light. And as one approaches ever closer to the
“speed of light” in a purely refined intuitive manner, time no longer appears
to pass and one experiences the present moment (continually renewed).
So time and space are now understood in strictly relative
terms that emanate from an absolute present moment.
It is somewhat the reverse that happens with respect to
acceleration (which is equivalent to gravity).
Relating to my own experience of the “dark night”, one of
the chief early features that I experienced was a dramatic slowing down in the
psychological experience of time. Indeed for the first few months especially,
each moment seemed to hang over me as if an eternity.
I later came to realise that this in turn was due to a
dramatic intensification in contemplative type development that initially came
into strong conflict with the deeply rooted phenomenal attachments of my
previous life.
Thus as I felt increasingly separated from this former life
through continual immersion in a dark and congested inner world, a profound
form of grief was experienced (which was intimately related to the
psychological experience of time standing still).
Though the darkness continued for some considerable time,
the intense psychological awareness of time was to ease somewhat due to the
fact that my habitual situation had now stabilised to a degree. So the intense
acceleration experienced in the initial dramatic entry into the “dark night”,
was no longer a key factor.
However the slowing down in the psychological experience of
time is a somewhat universal feature of the experience of loss e.g. the death
of a loved one.
Thus because of the loss of a shared intimate bond, through
which our sense of interdependence with the world is experienced, the feeling
of grief in inevitable, which again relates to the psychological notion of
gravity with respect to the psychic material of our lives i.e. in the loss of
what most deeply matters to us.
In more general terms, dramatic changes in the psychological
experience of time (and space) likewise characterise all stress reactions and I
believe that this key factor has been widely ignored in our attempts to
understand the nature of stress.
So returning to the quote attributed to Einstein, when one places one's hand on a hot stove, this causes an immediate form of stress, where due to the pain involved, one experiences an intense moment of separation with one's whole world momentarily reduced to the confines of the space of one's physical body. And this separation from the world then causes an acute slowing down in the psychological experience of time.
Though Einstein did indeed do so much to show the
relative physical nature of space and time, I strongly believe that the most
important aspect has been missed, which points to the truly relative nature of both their physical and psychological aspects.
A strong belief still conventionally exists in the linear
nature of space and time i.e. the notion that events in both time and space
move solely in a forward direction.
However this represents but a reduced view of such events
whereby they are - misleadingly - understood externally in an objective manner as
independent of the observer.
In truth an interactive relationship, entailing both
external and internal aspects is always necessarily involved in a complementary
manner. And when this relationship is explicitly recognised, then the nature of
space and time is rendered as purely relative.
So again we have two aspects to this relationship.
From one perspective, we have the movement externally of events
in physical space and time (with respect to the - relative - internal psychological
observer).
Then equally from the complementary perspective we have the
movement of recognition internally in psychological space and time (with
respect to the - relative - external
physical events).
Now if we take the movement, as is customary, of the external
events in physical space and time in a positive (forward) direction, then -
relatively - the corresponding movement of psychological recognition with
respect to these events takes place in a negative (backward) direction.
However if one now takes the recognition of such events in
psychological space and time as moving in a positive (forward) direction, then
the corresponding movement in physical space and time takes place - relatively -
in a negative (backward) direction.
Thus when both physical and psychological aspects, which are
relatively external and internal with respect to each other, are explicitly
taken into account then all events are revealed as having both positive (forward)
and negative (backward) directions in space and time.
Thus the physical and psychological aspects of
space and time complement each other in both positive and negative terms.
In other words the true nature of space and time is revealed as purely relative.
Furthermore the keen appreciation of such relativity takes
place against a background in the absolute
present moment.
Due to the growing dominance of scientific rationalism in
the past few centuries we have been trained to look at reality - especially with
respect to physical behaviour - in a reduced analytic manner where the (external)
objective is viewed in abstraction from the (internal) subjective aspect.
However the neglected holistic dimension to such experience,
which equates with true contemplative vision, views both external and internal aspects
as comprising complementary aspects of an - ultimately - indivisible unity, in
the intuitive appreciation of the interdependence of reality occurring in the present
moment.
Then when we combine both analytic and holistic aspects, in the
marriage of both rational understanding and such contemplative vision, then all
events in space and time are understood to possess a strictly relative meaning emanating
from the absolute present moment (continually renewed).
From a holistic perspective, accepted interpretation of
reality (where the external is considered in abstraction from the internal aspect),
is 1-dimensional in nature.
So what I have been illustrating i.e. where two poles are
viewed as complementary opposites, constitutes
2-dimensional interpretation (in holistic terms).
The two poles are + 1 and – 1 with respect to each other,
which concurs with the two roots of 1. So the holistic notion of 2 (as dimension)
relates to appreciation of the complementary understanding of + 1 and – 1 (where
signs are interchangeable) whereas the corresponding two roots of 1 entail the
opposite interpretation (where signs are non-interchangeable).
Thus understood correctly in 2-dimensional holistic terms,
all events in space and time (with respect to their physical and
psychological aspects) possess both positive and negative directions of movement.
From a universal perspective therefore space and time
movements are rendered to be strictly relative (as phenomenal events emanating
from the absolute present moment).
Before leaving, I will now deal briefly with the holistic
meaning of 4 dimensions (which is of special importance).
So again, whereas two dimensions relates to positive and
negative directions in real space and time, four dimensions relates to positive
and negative directions with respect to both real and imaginary space and time.
Thus it is vital to appreciate in this holistic context the notions of imaginary space and imaginary time. .
Now whereas real events in space and time relate directly to
the local appreciation of events in a direct conscious manner, imaginary events
relate to their holistic appreciation in an indirectly conscious manner (that
is directly expressive of unconscious meaning).
Whether we advert to it or not, in psychological terms, all phenomenal objects
serve both a real and imaginary purpose.
For example say one is buying a new house! From one
perspective the house can be viewed in conscious terms as an object in real
space and time; however from another perspective the house can be viewed in unconscious terms as serving in some way the holistic desire for meaning
(which then gets indirectly projected on to house as a means of fulfilling this
desire).
Indeed this is even obvious from the manner in which one
may refer to a new house as one’s “dream home”.
Generally speaking both the real and imaginary directions of
space and time get considerably confused with each other in experience with a
consequent reduced interpretation taking place in a solely real manner.
However with highly refined intuitive experience, phenomenal
objects can briefly serve as archetypal expressions of a holistic meaning that
is not confused with their conscious identity.
And when this happens - quite literally - such objects are
thereby understood appropriately as existing in imaginary space and time.
And just as with real experience, we can again distinguish
two directions, external and internal which are positive and negative with
respect to each other.
And this is strictly true of all phenomena, whether
operating at the human conscious level or in physical terms.
For all objects have both external and internal aspects, in
the manner they are related to other objects.
Likewise all objects have both local identities (as real)
where their independent identity is exercised. However, equally all objects
have a holistic identity (as imaginary) whereby their interdependence with other
objects is expressed. And this especially
applies to the very nature of sub-atomic particles. For example virtual
particles could equally be expressed as imaginary particles!
So when one looks at reality in an appropriate holistic
4-dimensional manner, phenomenal interactions, in physical and
psychological terms are understood to occur in both real and imaginary space
and time (with positive and negative directions).
Comments
Post a Comment