Skip to main content

Multidimensional Nature of Time and Space (4)

When we look at the nature of time in dynamic interactive terms, entailing both external and internal aspects, it necessarily reveals physical and psychic aspects that are complementary in nature.

My first clear realisation of this came from the study of Special Theory of Relativity when it became apparent to me that the physical notions that Einstein outlined had corresponding equivalents in terms of the psychological experience of time.

For example as the speed of light is approached, physical time passes ever more quickly (relative to a static observer). Then eventually at the speed of light, time no longer has a strict meaning, existing within its own frame of reference in the present moment.


Likewise from the complementary spiritual perspective, as one approaches "the speed of light" in an ever more refined nondual contemplative process, time also speeds up (relative to normal dualistic activity). Then in the pure contemplative light (of spiritual union) time loses any strict meaning with only the present moment experienced that is continually renewed.

Indeed this experience in some measure is typical of a couple in love sharing each other's company. So the absence of the consciousness of time is here due to the high level of interdependence in the relationship. This in turn leads to a fusion of the complementary external and internal polarities with respect to time resulting in a shared experience of the present moment!


Likewise from the opposite standpoint of extreme gravity as within a black hole, time in physical terms slows down relative to an outside observer.

Once again there is a direct counterpart in the mystical experience of the "dark night" where experience of time can so greatly slow down that each second can hang on one as an eternity.

As I have written in other places this is often associated with intense feelings of grief (which represents the psychological equivalent of gravity!).


Likewise in common experience, feelings of stress and anxiety are often associated with shifts in the experience of time (whereby one becomes conscious of an acute slowing down in its movement). And this again relates to an intensification of psychological gravity!


In related manner, space has its complementary psychological equivalent.

The track events have just got underway at the London Olympics. One can imagine how the finishing line might feel far away for exhausted athletes trying to hold off competitors in the final sprint for glory. By contrast a golfer when putting high in confidence, might "see" the hole as big as a bucket!


So the qualitative aspect of both space and time arises from this dynamic interaction as between external and internal aspects.

And once again as external and internal aspects characterise everything in nature, this means all phenomenal interactions entail both complementary quantitative and qualitative aspects (with respect to time and space).


I have already quoted in an earlier entry the well-known example given by Einstein when asked to simply illustrate the nature of Relativity:

"When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it seems like two hours that's relativity."


However what I find fascinating about this quote is that it relates to the psychological rather the physical nature of time. Indeed in terms of what I have stated, we can see how Einstein is showing how time speeds up from a psychological perspective in the delightful presence of "a nice girl" while in stark contrast, it slows down dramatically due to the internal psychological gravity induced from touching a hot stove!


So clearly time and space have complementary quantitative (physical) and qualitative (psychological) aspects that apply - by definition - potentially to every phenomenon in nature. However Einsteins Theory of Relativity is geared merely to quantitative explanation of these dimensions (though the quantitative has no strict meaning in the absence of the qualitative). So Einstein's theories are limited in the sense, that in being based on the classical paradigm they mistakenly conceive of the external physical as somehow independent of the internal psychological aspect of reality. And strictly speaking this assumption is untenable!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Number 137

The number 137 has raised considerable interest. Its reciprocal (1/137) approx. is referred to as the fine structure constant in physics and is related to the probability of electrons (or other particles) emitting or absorbing particles. Much has been written regarding the "mystical" properties of this number. Indeed some years ago my attention was drawn to its significance through correspondence relating to Jungian archetypes. And just recently an interesting article by Giorgio Piacenza has been published on Frank Visser's Integral World web-site. Without wanting to claim too much for the "mystical significance" of this number, I would like to initially broaden the topic to highlight some important general properties of prime numbers (of which 137 is a specific example). From one perspective prime numbers can be viewed as the basic building blocks of the natural number system (which we literally view in a linear manner as stretched out on a strai

Higgs Boson or Higgs Illusion

I was looking at the BBC Horizon programme last night on the Higgs Boson which proved quite interesting. As was widely reported in the media late last year, a determined attempt has been made to find convincing experimental evidence for the existence of the Higgs Boson which if verified would help to complete the standard particle model of physics. One outstanding problem with this model is that it had yet to provide a convincing explanation as to how particles acquire mass. And as this requirement is crucial for explaining the existence of all phenomena, the issue is of great importance. It had been proposed in the late 60's by Peter Higgs that what gives mass to particles is related to a seemingly invisible field viz. the Higgs Field. And as all fields are associated with corresponding particles, it was postulated that if this supposition of the existence of a new field was correct that it should in principle be possible to detect its associated particle. However the tech

Special Relativity - a new perspective

In his famous 1905 article where he introduced his "Special Theory of "Relativity", Einstein successfully challenged our conventional notions of space and time. This world view maintained that measurements of space and time were absolute for all observers. For example, if one carefully measured the length of a car, then this distance would remain the same for all observers (irrespective of movement). So for example from this viewpoint as a car accelerated, its length would remain the same (despite the increase in speed!) However Einstein convincingly demonstrated that such understanding is in error and that the actual distance crucially depends on the relative movement of what is measured. Though we do not notice such differences at speeds significantly less than that of light, they do exist. For an object travelling at 87% of the speed of light, measured length would be just half of that registered in static terms. Such differences equally apply to time with a moving ob